Quality Assurance Framework

Our transparent evaluation process ensures every student receives consistent, fair, and comprehensive assessment of their skills and project work.

Grading System & Performance Levels

Clear performance thresholds to measure your progress and achievements

90%+

Outstanding

Top performers who demonstrate exceptional understanding, implementation quality, and best practices. Eligible for distinction certification.

80%+

Performer

Strong performers with solid understanding and good implementation skills. Ready for entry-level professional roles.

70%+

Qualified

Meets minimum competency requirements. Has foundational knowledge and skills to continue learning and growing.

Below 70%

Needs Retake

Additional learning required. Students are provided with personalized feedback and support to improve and resubmit.

Comprehensive Evaluation Process

Multiple assessment touchpoints ensure thorough evaluation of your skills and understanding

Code Review

Comprehensive evaluation of your project codebase covering:

  • Code quality, structure, and organization
  • Best practices and design patterns
  • Error handling and edge cases
  • Documentation and code comments

Feature Evaluation & Testing

Testing and validation of implemented features:

  • Functionality and feature completeness
  • User experience and interface quality
  • Performance and optimization
  • Production-readiness standards

1-on-1 Interview Sessions

Personal evaluation sessions with mentor panel:

  • Technical understanding and concept clarity
  • Problem-solving approach and methodology
  • Project decisions and technical choices
  • Overall learning journey and progress

Feedback & Grading Rounds

Iterative feedback process for continuous improvement:

  • Detailed written feedback on submissions
  • Clear improvement suggestions and guidance
  • Transparent marking with breakdown by category
  • Follow-up calls to discuss results

Project Submission Quality Standards

Production-standard requirements for final project submissions

1

Feature Implementation (14-28 days)

Students select 2 features from the To-Be-Implemented list and develop them to production standards during the implementation phase.

2

Project Submission

Complete project submission with source code, documentation, deployment links, and demonstration video showcasing implemented features.

3

Mentor Panel Review

Comprehensive evaluation by experienced mentors covering code quality, functionality, best practices, and overall implementation approach.

4

Final Grading & Certification

Students scoring 70% or above receive professional certification. Detailed feedback provided to all participants for continuous improvement.

Certification Requirements

Clear criteria for earning your professional certification

Minimum Passing Score: 70%

Students must achieve a minimum of 70% in the final evaluation to qualify for certification. This ensures foundational competency in the bootcamp curriculum.

Project Completion

Successful implementation and submission of required project features with proper documentation and working deployment.

Interview Performance

Demonstration of technical understanding and ability to explain project decisions during the 1-on-1 evaluation session.

Retake Opportunity

Students scoring below 70% receive detailed feedback and are given the opportunity to improve and resubmit their projects with mentor support.

Our Commitment to Transparency

We believe in complete transparency in our evaluation process. Every student receives:

  • Detailed breakdown of grades across all evaluation criteria
  • Written feedback highlighting strengths and areas for improvement
  • Access to mentor panel for questions and clarifications
  • Public display of anonymized performance metrics to inspire excellence

Ready to Experience Quality Education?

Join our bootcamps and benefit from our comprehensive quality assurance framework